Nakamoto coefficients are not a good way to measure decentralization. They can be easily gamed, and considering a mining pool as a single entity in this context is highly misleading.
Leaning into this metric, which is not defined precisely enough to avoid a biased interpretation, puts Kaspa in line with projects like Nano and Chia, who lean heavily into it because that's the only narrative they can extract from their morbidly misaligned incentives.
Kaspa doesn't need optics that place it in the same rubric when it can provide infinitely better justifications for its superiority.
Show original
9.31K
146
The content on this page is provided by third parties. Unless otherwise stated, OKX is not the author of the cited article(s) and does not claim any copyright in the materials. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not represent the views of OKX. It is not intended to be an endorsement of any kind and should not be considered investment advice or a solicitation to buy or sell digital assets. To the extent generative AI is utilized to provide summaries or other information, such AI generated content may be inaccurate or inconsistent. Please read the linked article for more details and information. OKX is not responsible for content hosted on third party sites. Digital asset holdings, including stablecoins and NFTs, involve a high degree of risk and can fluctuate greatly. You should carefully consider whether trading or holding digital assets is suitable for you in light of your financial condition.